What makes associate surveys strategic?
The main reason why an associate survey
should not be conducted as an ordinary routine HR-project, is that the survey itself impacts the organization,
so this intervention should be carefully considered and leveraged for strategic
opportunities.
We do not have to apply Heisenberg’s
uncertainty principle or other quantum mechanics theories to understand that
when we measure the satisfaction level of associates about certain aspects we
are at the same time directly affecting their expectations about these aspects.
This in turn implies a change of their satisfaction level, i.e. the very thing
that is being measured. (Remember that satisfaction is always the delta between
experience and expectation. See [link] EUCUSA Methodology for details.)
In our hundreds of survey projects we have
discovered that our method is not only superior to other known approaches to
employee surveys across company sizes, industries, sectors and cultures. The
EUCUSA method is especially suitable for the very best companies, those that
want to go “From Good To Great” (© Jim Collins), or want to preserve their
excellence.
Spiral of success
It is well known that employee satisfaction
strongly correlates with measured customer satisfaction. Satisfied clients mean
good business and successful and thus more satisfied and motivated employees
who in turn achieve higher satisfaction levels for their customers. This
virtuous circle can be preserved by protecting and nurturing the concrete
aspects that are responsible for the improvements.
Participation
During the time-tested Target and Planning Workshop, representatives of all relevant stakeholders
of the company agree upon common goals. This is possible by virtue of the
systemic approach of EUCUSA (see [link] Methodology), which focuses on the
process and leaves the details to the expertise of the client. The project team
develops the survey media and content (i.e. the questions, which we call
“aspects”). A concise project plan clarifies the concrete steps, timelines and
responsibilities. The project team will also agree on the communication
strategy regarding all aspects of the survey, i.e. the amount of openness or
secrecy to be maintained within the company and towards the public.
Results
At EUCUSA, when we think about results, we
usually ask the following question beforehand: “How will we know afterwards,
that the process has been successful?”
Ideally, a strategic associate survey
·
Identifies areas of success
that need to be preserved and celebrated
·
Identifies problem areas that
need immediate attention
·
Identifies opportunities that
represent untapped potential
·
Identifies those successful
aspects that could create major problems if not preserved
·
Credibly communicates
management’s concern for the organization’s associates
·
Includes a feedback strategy
and communication of the results to all participants
·
Helps implement cultural change
or reinforce cultural values
·
Helps explain strategic goals
and to what degree employees are aligned with them
·
Is a fun project rather than a
cumbersome burden on associates
·
Is inclusive by involving all
stakeholders and decision makers in all phases of the project
·
Has a high participation rate
of above 80%.
·
Conveys respect and
appreciation both during the survey and in the post-survey feedback sessions
·
Directly leads to action for
improvement
·
Immediately raises dedication
(motivation) and productivity
·
Helps management understand key
drivers for value creation
In more than a decade of servicing clients,
EUCUSA has consistently achieved mostly all of these survey benchmarks. This
can be verified quite simply by asking our clients. ([link] References).
Benchmarking
By comparing their own results with the
EUCUSA benchmarking database our clients learn where exactly the company
stands. Through internal benchmarking best performers within the organization (such
as the best organizational unit) can be showcased and expose potential. A
section about benchmarking is included in all EUCUSA main reports. For more
details on our benchmarking see [link] EUCUSA Methodology.
Anonymity
Consider
the implications on trust before commissioning your HR service provider with an
employee survey or doing it yourself.
In associate surveys, anonymity is of pivotal
importance. Employees have to be sure that the data is not available to HR,
management, trade unions or other entities inside or outside the company, but
that the results will only be available in the aggregate. If this principle is
violated, participation rates will suffer and – more importantly – the validity
of the obtained answers will be seriously jeopardized.
One strategy to safeguard employees’
privacy, is to guarantee that reports are only generated if there is a minimum
of 10 responses per group available. This prevents identification by inference.
Our tested process for collecting and evaluating paper-based questionnaires
(even in large companies with many associates in multiple countries) as well as
state-of-the-art security for online questionnaires ensure that employees can
feel safe, answer the questions with confidence and reveal their true opinions
about critical issues.
Project Timing
The average duration of a survey project,
from project kick-off (Target and Planning Workshop) to the presentation of the
survey results is two months. Sophisticated technology [link] in partnership
with the leading software provider GlobalPark ensure that we will beat any
survey provider’s time when it comes to collection, evaluation and report
generation.
In principle, members of the client-side
project team do not have to invest much time: usually, one day for the Target
and Planning Workshop and half a day for the presentation of results are
sufficient. During the project, the main task of the project team is to promote
the survey.
It is a common pitfall that associate
surveys are conducted – even if for the right reasons – as some kind of
“must-have”, but the process stops with the presentation of the report. The
first question most companies try to answer is the usual “Now we have the
results, so what?” They try to decide what actionable measures seem necessary
or advisable in the light of the survey results (such as suggested by the
[link] EUCUSA Action Portfolio). However, this activity is often lacking a
structured process and a follow-up strategy.
EUCUSA often assists in this (sometimes
quite sensitive) task by conducting or organizing “reflection workshops” at all
hierarchical levels of the organization in order to facilitate the development
of concrete action plans prompted by the Action Portfolio summary present in
every EUCUSA survey report. But EUCUSA can also provide a scalable online
monitoring tool to keep track of progress towards identified goals even in very
large organizations. In this case, the survey follow-up can take many months or
even evolve into a continuous quality loop leading all the way to the next
periodic comprehensive employee survey.
















